[dancer-users] Dancer2::Template::Mason2

[Slavik Goltser]

I agree on the naming (it was a conflict in my mind when I was doing it).
the data_dir is literally ripped out from the original. any idea where it
puts things without any data_dir definition?


On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 2:18 PM, Pedro Melo <melo at simplicidade.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 5:34 PM, Slavik Goltser <slavikg at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> there is already a Dancer::Template::Mason, this plugin is intended to be
>> a Dancer2 module.
>>
>
> Sure, I know, but I'm saying that the name should be
> Dancer2::Template::Mason not Dancer2::Template::Mason2, because the
> template system is called Mason, not Mason2.
>
>
>
>> data_dir ... I followed the original module closely, will take a look to
>> see what happens when it isn't there.
>>
>
> I think in the situation less is more. The less you add as semantics to
> your layer, the less documentation one needs to know how D2::T::Mason will
> work, because you can say "just look at Mason defaults".
>
> Besides, there is no good data_dir default to use. Your suggestion about
> using comp_root/data is not good because with shared perl installs you
> might not even have permissions to write there. The default data_dir
> doesn't have that problem.
>
>
>> thank you for taking a look.
>>
>
> No problem. I'm still using a git submodule to have my own
> Dancer2::Template::Mason module, so having this on CPAN will make my life
> easier.
>
> Bye,
> --
> Pedro Melo
> @pedromelo
> http://www.simplicidade.org/
> xmpp:melo at simplicidade.org
> mailto:melo at simplicidade.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> dancer-users mailing list
> dancer-users at dancer.pm
> http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20130930/764f09a0/attachment.html>