[Dancer-users] Dancer 1 or 2?

[sawyer x]

Wow, that's pretty cool!

Thanks for posting and good luck with it.
I think an article/post about your experience with it will be very valuable.

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Niels Larsen <niels at genomics.dk> wrote:

> Okay, will do. I may try Openshift,
>
>
> https://www.redhat.com/openshift/community/kb/kb-e1014-how-to-deploy-the-perl-dancer-framework-on-openshift-express
>
> and just post this so all know that Redhat thinks
> Openshift + dancer is possible.
>
> Niels
>
>
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 23:06 +0200, sawyer x wrote:
> > One should still use Dancer 1.
> >
> > Dancer 2 is under heavy development but hasn't matured enough yet to
> > be used in production. It's "bleeding edge" in every sense of the
> > word. :)
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Niels Larsen <niels at genomics.dk>
> > wrote:
> >         Greetings,
> >
> >         If today one were to start making a "production-mode"
> >         site that must work reliably and be available in early
> >         May, should one use dancer 1 or 2?
> >
> >         Niels L
> >
> >         http://genomics.dk
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dancer-users mailing list
> Dancer-users at perldancer.org
> http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.backup-manager.org/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20120125/19f91342/attachment.htm>