[Dancer-users] Dancer 1 or 2?
xsawyerx at gmail.com
Wed Jan 25 22:20:04 CET 2012
Wow, that's pretty cool!
Thanks for posting and good luck with it.
I think an article/post about your experience with it will be very valuable.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:18 PM, Niels Larsen <niels at genomics.dk> wrote:
> Okay, will do. I may try Openshift,
> and just post this so all know that Redhat thinks
> Openshift + dancer is possible.
> On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 23:06 +0200, sawyer x wrote:
> > One should still use Dancer 1.
> > Dancer 2 is under heavy development but hasn't matured enough yet to
> > be used in production. It's "bleeding edge" in every sense of the
> > word. :)
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Niels Larsen <niels at genomics.dk>
> > wrote:
> > Greetings,
> > If today one were to start making a "production-mode"
> > site that must work reliably and be available in early
> > May, should one use dancer 1 or 2?
> > Niels L
> > http://genomics.dk
> Dancer-users mailing list
> Dancer-users at perldancer.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dancer-users