[Dancer-users] Dancer 1 or 2?
niels at genomics.dk
Wed Jan 25 22:18:30 CET 2012
Okay, will do. I may try Openshift,
and just post this so all know that Redhat thinks
Openshift + dancer is possible.
On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 23:06 +0200, sawyer x wrote:
> One should still use Dancer 1.
> Dancer 2 is under heavy development but hasn't matured enough yet to
> be used in production. It's "bleeding edge" in every sense of the
> word. :)
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Niels Larsen <niels at genomics.dk>
> If today one were to start making a "production-mode"
> site that must work reliably and be available in early
> May, should one use dancer 1 or 2?
> Niels L
More information about the Dancer-users