[Dancer-users] ssl questions

[David Precious]

On Tuesday 31 May 2011 17:24:55 Brian E. Lozier wrote:
> This is helpful, thank you.  If the logic for having plack/psgi apps
> behind a proxy is already handled in Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy,
> why is this happening again in Dancer?  Is there an intention for
> Dancer app developers to use Plack::Middleware modules or have all the
> "important" ones recreated inside Dancer?  Is there an advantage to
> using behind_proxy => 1 vs. using Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy
> directly?  It looks like all the middleware does is reset some
> environment variables so the Dancer app will think it's being run
> directly.

It's a pretty important feature which is going to be required by some people, 
and some people could object to installing additional modules to make it work.

Feel free to use Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy instead though if you're 
happy to install it :)

Cheers

Dave P

-- 
David Precious  ("bigpresh")
http://www.preshweb.co.uk/

   "Programming is like sex. One mistake and you have to support
   it for the rest of your life". (Michael Sinz)