[Dancer-users] POLL - Hierachical config settings - preferred implementation?

[Christopher Taranto]

On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 12:59 PM, Alberto Simoes <ambs at perl-hackers.net>wrote:

> On 30/04/2011 20:15, David Precious wrote:
>
>>
>>   set 'engines/simple/extension' =>  'tt';
>>
>>  >    vs
>
>
>>   set engines =>  { +simple =>  { +extension =>  'tt' } };
>>
>> So, the question is, which do you prefer?
>>
>
> I prefer the first, not because it was my first implementation, but because
> it mimics XPath (or directory structure). But I understand that we are
> adding a specific syntax that is not Perl related, and that is why I offered
> myself to implement the Moose syntax. I just didn't have the time and
> open-mind to implement it.
>
>
I also vote for the first since it seems more direct and simple.  The Moose
syntax causes me to pause for a moment to parse it all out.

Is there any advantage to the Moose syntax style?

Christopher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.backup-manager.org/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20110430/97db343e/attachment.htm>