Starman vs Plack::Handler::Apache2 my results
Hello again, I am running this page http://dancer.1.ai using plackup -E deployment -s Starman --workers=10 -p 5001 -a ./bin/app.pl > and this page http://elephant.1.ai/perl using Plack::Handler::Apache2 in my tests Plack::Handler::Apache2 seems to be faster. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? I did try both with curl + safari and chrome benchmarks and even http://whichloadsfaster.com :) Thanks for your comments Regards David
Starman has some performance benchmarking here<https://metacpan.org/module/Starman#PERFORMANCE>but they don't include Apache. I guess it also matters what extensions you have on Apache and how well it's configured. I am surprised it gets you better performance than Starman... It would be interesting to raise this on irc.perl.org's #plack and see what they think. On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:59 AM, David C gurugeek <1@1.ai> wrote:
Hello again, I am running this page
http://dancer.1.ai using plackup -E deployment -s Starman --workers=10 -p 5001 -a ./bin/app.pl >
and this page http://elephant.1.ai/perl using Plack::Handler::Apache2
in my tests Plack::Handler::Apache2 seems to be faster. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? I did try both with curl + safari and chrome benchmarks and even http://whichloadsfaster.com :) Thanks for your comments Regards David _______________________________________________ Dancer-users mailing list Dancer-users@perldancer.org http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
I'm guessing that you had Apache more favorably tuned than Starman These are the equivalent Apache settings you used for Starman StartServers 1 MaxClients 10 Also, you might want to make sure these settings are in alignment for your test. MinSpareServers MaxSpareServers MaxRequestsPerChild Jesse On 9/12/2012 8:59 PM, David C gurugeek wrote:
Hello again, I am running this page
http://dancer.1.ai using plackup -E deployment -s Starman --workers=10 -p 5001 -a ./bin/app.pl >
and this page http://elephant.1.ai/perl using Plack::Handler::Apache2
in my tests Plack::Handler::Apache2 seems to be faster. Shouldn't it be the other way around ? I did try both with curl + safari and chrome benchmarks and even http://whichloadsfaster.com :) Thanks for your comments Regards David _______________________________________________ Dancer-users mailing list Dancer-users@perldancer.org http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
participants (3)
-
David C gurugeek -
Jesse Thompson -
sawyer x