Starman has some performance benchmarking here but they don't include Apache.
I guess it also matters what extensions you have on Apache and how well it's configured.
I am surprised it gets you better performance than Starman...

It would be interesting to raise this on irc.perl.org's #plack and see what they think.

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:59 AM, David C gurugeek <1@1.ai> wrote:
Hello again,
I am running this page

http://dancer.1.ai using
plackup -E deployment -s Starman --workers=10 -p 5001 -a ./bin/app.pl >

and this page
http://elephant.1.ai/perl using Plack::Handler::Apache2

in my tests Plack::Handler::Apache2 seems to be faster. Shouldn't it be the other way around ?
I did try both with curl  + safari and chrome benchmarks and even http://whichloadsfaster.com :)
Thanks for your comments
Regards
David
_______________________________________________
Dancer-users mailing list
Dancer-users@perldancer.org
http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users