On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 5:16 PM, Mr. Puneet Kishor <punk.kish@gmail.com>wrote:
On Nov 25, 2011, at 9:03 AM, al wrote:
I think dancerctl is a great idea and will be useful to many people. However, I would not like it to be imposed on us in the future by integrating it into the core as such. Personally, I prefer to create my own custom ctl scripts because some of my apps have unique startup requirements, such as chrooting. Also, since your script calls system commands such as ps, it is unlikely it will be platform agnostic.
I wholeheartedly agree. `dancerctl` (or, my own `web_ctl`) is a good solution for a very specific setup (Dancer + plackup). It won't work in other deployment situations, and certainly won't work on Windows. It should not be a part of the core. Perhaps it could be offered as a plugin, or remain an external utility.
Those are good points. Thanks for raising them!
On 24 November 2011 12:55, Nick Knutov <mail@knutov.com> wrote:
The first idea is just call dancertctl from dancer (something like
`dancer
start` calls `dancerctl start`) - this allows visually integrate them now while code will remain separate.
Dancer-users mailing list Dancer-users@perldancer.org http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
_______________________________________________ Dancer-users mailing list Dancer-users@perldancer.org http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users