I wholeheartedly agree. `dancerctl` (or, my own `web_ctl`) is a good solution for a very specific setup (Dancer + plackup). It won't work in other deployment situations, and certainly won't work on Windows. It should not be a part of the core. Perhaps it could be offered as a plugin, or remain an external utility.
On Nov 25, 2011, at 9:03 AM, al wrote:
> I think dancerctl is a great idea and will be useful to many people.
> However, I would not like it to be imposed on us in the future by
> integrating it into the core as such. Personally, I prefer to create
> my own custom ctl scripts because some of my apps have unique startup
> requirements, such as chrooting. Also, since your script calls system
> commands such as ps, it is unlikely it will be platform agnostic.
>
>
> On 24 November 2011 12:55, Nick Knutov <mail@knutov.com> wrote:
>> The first idea is just call dancertctl from dancer (something like `dancer
>> start` calls `dancerctl start`) - this allows visually integrate them now
>> while code will remain separate.
> _______________________________________________
> Dancer-users mailing list
> Dancer-users@perldancer.org
> http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
_______________________________________________
Dancer-users mailing list
Dancer-users@perldancer.org
http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users