29 Dec
2010
29 Dec
'10
10:29 a.m.
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 11:45 AM, sawyer x <xsawyerx@gmail.com> wrote:
You could try and add a value of "thin PSGI layer" or something like that, but that should garnish probably the lowest of them all, so maybe not worth it.
You might be right but we can't really know that. If it gets 0.5% now and 2.5% a year from now then we might have some indication there. Without the first number the second will be a lot less meaningful. My issues is that I have no idea what "thin PSGI layer" means. Explanations or links would be welcome. Gabor