[dancer-users] Template::Tiny vs ForkedTiny

[Stefan Hornburg (Racke)]

On 11/16/2017 08:37 AM, Gabor Szabo wrote:
> Hi again,
> 
> I am still into the templating systems of Dancer.
> 
> It seems Dancer2 requires Template::Tiny  in its cpanfile but it never
> uses it. Instead there is a re-implementation of it at
> https://metacpan.org/pod//Dancer2::Template::Implementation::ForkedTiny
> I am wondering why not use Template::Tiny? And if it isn't in use then
> why require it?

Dancer2::Template::Tiny says:

However, Dancer2 uses a modified version of L<Template::Tiny>, which is
L<Dancer2::Template::Implementation::ForkedTiny>. It adds 2 features :

=over

=item *

opening and closing tag are now configurable

=item *

CodeRefs are evaluated and their results is inserted in the result.

=back

I suppose the requirement of Template::Tiny isn't necessary.

Regards
         Racke



-- 
Ecommerce and Linux consulting + Perl and web application programming.
Debian and Sympa administration. Provisioning with Ansible.