[dancer-users] Dancer2 Deployment
Jochen Lutz
jlu at gmx.de
Mon Nov 16 18:08:17 GMT 2015
Am 04.11.15 um 13:20 schrieb Alex Mestiashvili:
> On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Jochen Lutz <jlu at gmx.de> wrote:
>
>> Am 03.11.15 um 09:56 schrieb Alex Mestiashvili:
>>
>>> There is an opinion that threads and processes are almost the same from
>>> the
>>> performance point of view:
>>>
>>> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/807506/threads-vs-processes-in-linux
>>>
>>
>> This is from April 2009 - more than 6.5 years old. It talks of Linux 2.4
>> vs. 2.6. We now have Linux 4.2; don't take this link too serious without
>> checking if it is still valid for recent kernels.
>>
>>
>
> The most valuable answer was last edited in 2012 with the comments from
> 2014.
> So I would assume that it is still valid even for 4.3.
> Are you aware of any significant changes in this field ?
Not particularly. I know that in 2.6 were big chances in the scheduling.
First the O(1) scheduler, later the CFQ scheduler. And the scheduler can
have significant influence on process and thread performance.
Jochen
More information about the dancer-users
mailing list