[dancer-users] comparison table D1/D2

[Henk van Oers]

On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, VinceW wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 03:58 PM, Sawyer X wrote:
>> 
>> I don't think "ports" actually means "porting", but the FreeBSD ports
>> system. It means "a package of the following for FreeBSD."

Yes. Sorry for the "DSL" :-)

> that was my interpretation also. Debian has also it's own package system. I can think of other distros too.
> 
> Should module packages for various distribution go on this list, or create another one for that information?
> The latter has my preference, there are so many distributions, I think it's worth a list on its own :-)

The FreeBSD ports collection is not a distribution but *is* a list on its own.
I can do the magic, from source, optional dependencies, custom packages.

> portable in comparison table was meant to mean: can a module for D1 be ported to D2 or vice versa

In D1 I am missing 
https://metacpan.org/pod/Dancer2::Plugin#on_plugin_import
and the my $dsl = shift;

[snip]

> Port:    p5-Dancer2-0.141000_1
> 
> What to do with them?

- First: upgrade to 0.150000
- Next: Make a "FreeBSD port" for 
https://metacpan.org/pod/Dancer2::Plugin::DBIC

Can't live without DBIC :-)

-- 
Henk