[dancer-users] comparison table D1/D2
Henk van Oers
hvo.pm at xs4all.nl
Fri Sep 12 21:36:59 BST 2014
On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, VinceW wrote:
> On 09/12/2014 03:58 PM, Sawyer X wrote:
>> I don't think "ports" actually means "porting", but the FreeBSD ports
>> system. It means "a package of the following for FreeBSD."
Yes. Sorry for the "DSL" :-)
> that was my interpretation also. Debian has also it's own package system. I can think of other distros too.
> Should module packages for various distribution go on this list, or create another one for that information?
> The latter has my preference, there are so many distributions, I think it's worth a list on its own :-)
The FreeBSD ports collection is not a distribution but *is* a list on its own.
I can do the magic, from source, optional dependencies, custom packages.
> portable in comparison table was meant to mean: can a module for D1 be ported to D2 or vice versa
In D1 I am missing
and the my $dsl = shift;
> Port: p5-Dancer2-0.141000_1
> What to do with them?
- First: upgrade to 0.150000
- Next: Make a "FreeBSD port" for
Can't live without DBIC :-)
More information about the dancer-users