[Dancer-users] Rebasing an application

[Flavio Poletti]

Hi,

    the module to solve my reverse proxy issues is ready and I like the idea
of addressing them in one single point.

Do you think that naming it Dancer::Middleware::Rebase is a problem? I
wouldn't want to invade the namespace if this is considered "precious".

Cheers,

    Flavio.


On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 9:15 AM, sawyer x <xsawyerx at gmail.com> wrote:

> Franck worked on an issue of mounting several Dancer apps under different
> paths. Apparently, it's possible to do so with PSGI. Perhaps that will meet
> your needs.
>
> Franck, do you remember what I'm talking about?
>
> On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Flavio Poletti <polettix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>    I'm working on a module for rebasing Dancer applications. In short, it
>> manipulates various $env components to make the request appear as coming to
>> a different host and path, in order to address various problems that I
>> encounter when I deploy the application behind a reverse proxy.
>>
>> It is implemented as a Plack middleware (inspired by
>> Plack::Middleware::ReverseProxy but with a different approach) and I'd like
>> some feedback about the module name. My idea is to call it
>> Dancer::Middleware::Rebase, following the suggestions in
>> http://advent.plackperl.org/2009/12/day-23-write-your-own-middleware.html
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>>    Flavio.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dancer-users mailing list
>> Dancer-users at perldancer.org
>> http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.backup-manager.org/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20110209/16166317/attachment.htm>