[Dancer-users] No more collisions of routes with multiple Dancer(1) apps!

[Alexis Sukrieh]

I think I need to clarify my views on this, and apologize as well for not expressing myslef more clearly in the first place.

First things first: patches are welcome, always.
Second: Dancer is free software, it relies on freetime of its maintainers.

Let's try not to get upset too quickly if we can ;)

Dancer 2 is going to be a major improvement, really. Many complex bugs will be fixed (like the collision one) it will run faster, be more extensible...

The only thing that I wanted to say in my previous email was that:
- most of the time spent nowdays is spent on 2
- Dancer 1 is "feature-frozen", in order to make the transition possible
- feedback and help are very much appreciated on 2
- there is a workaround in 1 for the apps collisions

This means that our priority is 2, from now on, new features wont be applied to 1, only bugfixes will be reviewed.

Eventhough, I'll take some time to review your PR, but please, dont take my first email personal, understand that behind Dancer, there are human beings, with real life issues to deal with, and that can have an impact on their freetime.

Thanks.

Le 29 nov. 2011 à 01:50, Perlover <perlover at perlover.com> a écrit :

> Hello,
> Thanks for reply.
> But I will use my own patched version of Dancer-1 (i don't have a time for adaptation for Dancer2)
> If you don't want patch - it's your choose of cause as of authors.
> Ok, lets your users will have a problems with multi apps...
> Bye
> 
> 28.11.2011 17:42 пользователь "Alexis Sukrieh" <sukria at sukria.net> написал:
> This kind of patches are actually not really what we watn to do since
> we have dancer2 on the way which is going to solve these collisions.
> 
> A better way to help the project is to test an upgrade of your app to
> Dancer 2. Thanks.
> 
> 2011/11/23 Perlover <perlover at perlover.com>:
> > Hello All,
> >
> > I made a changes for Dancer1!
> > Please to see pull request of https://github.com/sukria/Dancer/pull/703
> >
> > I added new option to config: routes_per_app
> >
> > If it is true in config routes will be work only for applications
> > where i its defined. If not true - it works as worked before (backward
> > compatible)
> > I wrote a test for it
> > All tests are passed
> >
> > Now i will test it in my real project
> > If i will find a some bugs i will notice you
> >
> > Best regards, Perlover
> >
> > P.S. And dear author(s) - please approve & merge other commit too - it
> > fix bug with request->header() -
> > https://github.com/sukria/Dancer/pull/702
> > _______________________________________________
> > Dancer-users mailing list
> > Dancer-users at perldancer.org
> > http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users
> >
> >
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.backup-manager.org/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20111201/c406e520/attachment.htm>