[Dancer-users] do something after sending response
dkrotkine at gmail.com
Fri Aug 12 12:29:17 CEST 2011
On 11 August 2011 20:40, sawyer x <xsawyerx at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:37 PM, Colin Keith <colinmkeith at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 2:27 PM, David Precious <davidp at preshweb.co.uk>
>> > On Thursday 11 August 2011 18:17:47 David Precious wrote:
>> >> Another possible alternative would be to fork a new process that will
>> >> the stuff in the background, whilst the original process continues
>> But as I thought about it a little more I realised that Dancer is
>> usually used in an application situation (is it application, daemon,
>> or some other term?) and so Dancer itself would keep running, unlike a
>> CGI script, and so be able to manage the child processes. You could
>> queue extra data if there are too many child processes or if the load
>> is too high, etc. You shouldn't even need to serialize it as the OP
>> mentioned unless it is large and you don't want it in memory or for
>> data safety in case of a restart of the application.
> Actually, since Dancer is run on top of PSGI (not necessarily, but mainly),
> it means that you could use the AnyEvent PSGI server and push stuff to be
> run in async, on your own.
That's a brillant idea, and probably the best compromise here. Forking has a
high payload, but keeping a unique background child or using msg queues
means serialization, which is not very convenient.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Dancer-users