Perfectly fine, thank you for politely asking, much appreciated. On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:34 PM, damien krotkine <dkrotkine@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi,

Feel free to take it, I don't see any problem.

Dams

Le 6 juil. 2012 à 17:54, David Cantrell <david@cantrell.org.uk> a écrit :

...

I need to write a little application, using Dancer, showing how to do unit testing. Anyone object to me grabbing the Dancer::Example::UnitTest namespace?

-- David Cantrell | Godless Liberal Elitist

What plaything can you offer me today? _______________________________________________ Dancer-users mailing list Dancer-users@perldancer.org http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users

---

Dancer-users mailing list Dancer-users@perldancer.org http://www.backup-manager.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/dancer-users

On Sat, 07 Jul 2012 14:34:54 +0200 Niels Larsen <niels@genomics.dk> wrote:

Dancers,

Should an unimplemented project that plans launch in 6 months use Dancer 1 or 2? anyone dare to guess when v2 might be ready to take over? sorry if i overlooked it.

We're making good progress getting Dancer2 production-ready; it already supports the vast majority of Dancer1's DSL, so most existing apps would need only trivial changes. The biggest work yet to do is converting plugins to support Dancer2 - for most plugins, there's not much work involved, and the core team will be reaching out to 3rd party plugin authors offering patches to add Dancer2 support (in a lot of cases, it's simply a case of testing that the plugin works and then tweak it to indicate it supports Dancer2; only plugins which delve into Dancer's internals are likely to require more in-depth changes). I would say, start playing with Dancer2, and speak to us in #dancer on irc.perl.org (or see http://dancer.pm/irc ) to discuss any issues you see. -- David Precious ("bigpresh") <davidp@preshweb.co.uk> http://www.preshweb.co.uk/ www.preshweb.co.uk/twitter www.preshweb.co.uk/linkedin www.preshweb.co.uk/facebook www.preshweb.co.uk/cpan www.preshweb.co.uk/github