Hi Andy I've got about the same memory usage per starman process. FWIW I keep different apps on different (smaller) servers. The pricing is comparable and I feel it's easier to upgrade/install Perl modules for one app without worrying about the impact on the other ones. Andrew On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Andrew Beverley <andy@andybev.com> wrote:
Hi dancers,
I'm trying to get an idea of what is a "normal" value in terms of memory use of Dancer2 running under Starman. I realise this is a "how long is a piece of string" question, but I would appreciate some replies to make a comparison.
I'm finding it's roughly 100MB per worker, which seems to be roughly the case regardless of the application. What do other people's run at? Is there any way I can reduce the memory use and/or where should I look to do so?
I'm running 10 different Dancer2 applications on a VPS with 4GB of memory. Each application has 2 Starman workers. This is about the limit of what I can run before the memory on the server tops out.
I'd like to get more applications per server. The applications generally have fairly light-utilisation, but my VPS provider has disabled swap space, so they can't be swapped out when they're not being used unfortunately.
Thanks,
Andy
_______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list dancer-users@dancer.pm http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
-- Andrew Solomon Mentor@Geekuni http://geekuni.com/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/asolomon