13 Jan
2011
13 Jan
'11
10:32 p.m.
Hello On 13/01/2011 22:28, sawyer x wrote:
This should be added as a minimal dependency. Someone suggested to use Any::YAML, perhaps we should consider changing YAML for it, so people could use YAML::Tiny, to get even lighter apps.
YAML::Any is *NOT* a good solution. If all back-ends were equally good (parsing the same definition of YAML but at different speeds) that would be good. But there are (is) some YAML back-ends in the list of YAML::Any that have some serious bugs. For instance, YAML::Syck has some problems on parsing some specific constructs. So, I would suggest to stick to your preferred YAML implementation. Cheers ambs