8 Dec
2013
8 Dec
'13
3:06 p.m.
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, sawyer x wrote:
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Henk van Oers <henk@signature.nl> wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, sawyer x wrote:
So Dancer::App and Dancer::Plugin are really not the same.
I told you so.
I thought you meant that if people can use Dancer::Plugin, why can't they use Dancer::App. I probably misunderstood.
(And Dancer::App is not a namespace yet, see: locate)
Dancer/App.pm is used internally. That's why Dancer/App/* is a problem. Dancer/Plugin/* is not because it's meant for that purpose.
Let me ask for an other namespace: Dancer::Loadapp
I don't think that's good either.
Why not?
Why can't this be a plugin, by the way?
I told you so.