I try both(catalyst too). For me is Dancer winner. You can look on http:// www.maxi-tip.cz , nicer, easy for use, modular, DSL, plugins. I have discussion with guy which has only prefer Mojo*. I look on Mojo and it looks similar. For me Mojo is OO philosophy and everything is installed in Mojo(such as JSON, etc...). I only try to find arguments why use Dancer instead Mojo. Is hypnotoad server better than plackup(with starman). How can look benchmark between Mojo and Dancer. ---------- Původní zpráva ---------- Od: David Precious <davidp@preshweb.co.uk> Datum: 15. 3. 2013 Předmět: Re: [dancer-users] Dancer vs Mojolicous "On Fri, 15 Mar 2013 17:34:37 +0100 (CET) <igor.bujna@post.cz> wrote:
i don't want to start flame, but only ask when I make any project, why do I should choose Dancer instead Mojo*.
You should choose whichever has the features you require, or whichever you feel more comfortable with. As most web frameworks have similar features, that latter point is likely to be far more important. My advice: give both a try, whichever you get a better feeling with, go with it. I originally found Dancer as an interested user, and it was the first framework that I didn't feel was getting in my way and forcing me to code the framework's way, but rather seemed to work with me - I realised with that feeling that I'd found the framework for me. Try both (and any others, Catalyst etc) until you get that same feeling, and then you have your answer. Nobody can tell you which framework is the best fit for you but you yourself. -- David Precious ("bigpresh") <davidp@preshweb.co.uk> http://www.preshweb.co.uk/ www.preshweb.co.uk/twitter www.preshweb.co.uk/linkedin www.preshweb.co.uk/facebook www.preshweb.co.uk/cpan www.preshweb.co.uk/github _______________________________________________ dancer-users mailing list dancer-users@dancer.pm http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users"