9 Jan
2014
9 Jan
'14
8:58 p.m.
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Shlomi Fish <shlomif@shlomifish.org> wrote:
Also, I consider D2 to still be alpha quality.
Can you please elaborate on which problems/bugs/etc. you ran into with Dancer2 that make you say that?
It's not stable. The API and internal architecture is still a work in progress. E.g. look at the 0.11 changes to redirect and forward. These *are* improvements (fixing the regressions that broke saving sessions in a hook), but the overall rate of change is still high enough that I deem Dancer2 "alpha" quality. David -- David Golden <xdg@xdg.me> Take back your inbox! → http://www.bunchmail.com/ Twitter/IRC: @xdg