On Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:34:37 +0100, David Precious <davidp@preshweb.co.uk> wrote: [...]
You're right though that, if following the details described in the docs
doesn't work that we need to get that sorted. There is a QA hackathon planned soon, I would hope that testing & improving deployment instructions could be part of that.
I agree. Moreover, I have to say that all my energy is put into a huge refactoring work these days, I'm rewriting *a lot* of Dancer's internal in order to improve the overall design. My plan is to have that rewrite finished before the hackaton in order to be able to test deployment strategies and improve documentation and tests. So please, before switching to another framework, give us a bit of time, maybe that issue will be fixed very soon. I'ma aware Dancer is still a bit rough on the edges, but I'm sure you can understand that Dancer is a young project that has evolved very quickly; which means, it needs a bit of time to get stable. Maybe my mistake in the first place was to use a 1.x version number. I plan to release 1.2 as soon as all these polishing issues are closed. Thanks for your interest in the project anyways, I hope you can give Dancer another try when the hackaton is finished. Regards, Alexis