On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Henk van Oers <henk@signature.nl> wrote:

On Sun, 8 Dec 2013, sawyer x wrote:

So Dancer::App and Dancer::Plugin are really not the same.

I told you so.

I thought you meant that if people can use Dancer::Plugin, why can't they use Dancer::App.
I probably misunderstood.

(And Dancer::App is not a namespace yet, see: locate)

Dancer/App.pm is used internally. That's why Dancer/App/* is a problem. Dancer/Plugin/* is not because it's meant for that purpose.

Let me ask for an other namespace: Dancer::Loadapp

I don't think that's good either.

Why can't this be a plugin, by the way?