31 May
2010
31 May
'10
6:18 p.m.
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 10:20:48PM +1000, Daniel Pittman wrote:
r('/stuff/(.*+)) qr/\/stuff\/(.*+)/
Er, isn't 'r' it literally identical to 'qr(/stuff/(.*+))' in this case?
yes it is! plus: you don't have to know what r() do: qr is just a perl operator.
So I would vote for applying your patch, but without replacing r('') which has a good reason to live, I think.
The only really good reason I can see, right now, is backward compatibility,
+1 marc