On 03/04/2016 06:04 PM, Daniel Boehmer wrote:
Hello Dancer folks,
I've written a plugin for Dancer2 for my current client and as soon as I get the written permission I'm ready to upload it to CPAN. It will be my first CPAN module, by the way.
The plugin enables the user to provide a Swagger2 file which specifies a web API including its paths and parameters. For all paths and HTTP methods a route is created automatically and connected to a controller method. The method might be defined with a predictable name in a certain namespace or might be provided from a callback.
Now my question is whether you have any remarks on the name of the module. I developed it as Dancer2::Plugin::Swagger2.
You'll find that Dancer::Plugin::Swagger [1] exists and goes the opposite way: Generate a Swagger spec from the Dancer app.
Also there is Mojolicious::Plugin::Swagger2 [2], a plugin similar to mine that provides route autogeneration for a different web framework that you might have heard of, Mojolicious;-)
I hope to get permission by Monday and see my module on CPAN before the German Perl Workshop next week.
So what do you think about the name?
Sounds good to me - see you at the GPW :-) Regards Racke
Kind regards Daniel Böhmer
[1] https://metacpan.org/pod/Dancer::Plugin::Swagger [2] https://metacpan.org/pod/Mojolicious::Plugin::Swagger2
-- Perl and Dancer Development