Sure, I know, but I'm saying that the name should be Dancer2::Template::Mason not Dancer2::Template::Mason2, because the template system is called Mason, not Mason2.

 

I think in the situation less is more. The less you add as semantics to your layer, the less documentation one needs to know how D2::T::Mason will work, because you can say "just look at Mason defaults".

Besides, there is no good data_dir default to use. Your suggestion about using comp_root/data is not good because with shared perl installs you might not even have permissions to write there. The default data_dir doesn't have that problem.

 

No problem. I'm still using a git submodule to have my own Dancer2::Template::Mason module, so having this on CPAN will make my life easier.

Bye,

--