26 Jan
2012
26 Jan
'12
9:13 a.m.
На Thu, 26 Jan 2012 10:54:37 +0200 sawyer x <xsawyerx@gmail.com> записано:
This seems like a well thought-out idea, but unfortunately I think it shouldn't be done. Dancer 2 is already completely OO and so is the DSL. The idea now is to simply keep Dancer 1 maintained as far as to let Dancer 2 be developed continually. Once Dancer 2 is ready, we'll start moving to it. It will already contain all the things people suggest to put into Dancer 1, being done more cleanly and correctly.
Moving to dancer 2 could be a big issue. And afaik dancer 2 simply is not ready. Meanwhile people may want to write modules. This approach is simple and can be used with an existing code base. -- С уважением, Роман Галеев, +7 347 2-900-145 www.ncom-ufa.ru