Le 07/10/2010 10:22, sawyer x a écrit :
I suggest first having the code to implement it, then deciding on a name. If the code is succinct enough, there's a chance to get it in core and not as a plugin. Generally, I would suggest integrating it if it's implemented cleanly.
To me, it's not a question of how succint and clean the code is. It's about the fact that Dancer is supposed to be a minimalist framework, that provides the obvious and nothing more. Plugins have been made to workaround the lack of feature of the core, and I think this is why so many people like Dancer; it stays out of the way. If we start implementing _in the core_ all this kinds of details, we're taking a path where we don't want to go, trust me. Even the core "ajax" keyword has been migrated to a plugin recently, for that very same reason. I really think this normalization stuff (which relies a lot on the developer's preferences and the direction of the wind) belongs to Plugin-land. Regards, -- Alexis Sukrieh