[dancer-users] Memory use of Dancer2 running under Starman

Andrew Solomon andrew at geekuni.com
Thu Mar 19 11:35:11 GMT 2015


Hi Andy

I've got about the same memory usage per starman process. FWIW I keep
different apps on different (smaller) servers. The pricing is comparable
and I feel it's easier to upgrade/install Perl modules for one app without
worrying about the impact on the other ones.

Andrew

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Andrew Beverley <andy at andybev.com> wrote:

> Hi dancers,
>
> I'm trying to get an idea of what is a "normal" value in terms of memory
> use of Dancer2 running under Starman. I realise this is a "how long is a
> piece of string" question, but I would appreciate some replies to make a
> comparison.
>
> I'm finding it's roughly 100MB per worker, which seems to be roughly the
> case regardless of the application. What do other people's run at? Is
> there any way I can reduce the memory use and/or where should I look to
> do so?
>
> I'm running 10 different Dancer2 applications on a VPS with 4GB of
> memory. Each application has 2 Starman workers. This is about the limit
> of what I can run before the memory on the server tops out.
>
> I'd like to get more applications per server. The applications generally
> have fairly light-utilisation, but my VPS provider has disabled swap
> space, so they can't be swapped out when they're not being used
> unfortunately.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andy
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dancer-users mailing list
> dancer-users at dancer.pm
> http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dancer-users
>



-- 
Andrew Solomon

Mentor at Geekuni http://geekuni.com/
http://www.linkedin.com/in/asolomon
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.preshweb.co.uk/pipermail/dancer-users/attachments/20150319/d0acc95f/attachment.html>


More information about the dancer-users mailing list