[Dancer-users] Dancer 1 or 2?

[Niels Larsen]

Okay, will do. I may try Openshift, 

https://www.redhat.com/openshift/community/kb/kb-e1014-how-to-deploy-the-perl-dancer-framework-on-openshift-express

and just post this so all know that Redhat thinks 
Openshift + dancer is possible.

Niels


On Wed, 2012-01-25 at 23:06 +0200, sawyer x wrote:
> One should still use Dancer 1.
> 
> Dancer 2 is under heavy development but hasn't matured enough yet to
> be used in production. It's "bleeding edge" in every sense of the
> word. :)
> 
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Niels Larsen <niels at genomics.dk>
> wrote:
>         Greetings,
>         
>         If today one were to start making a "production-mode"
>         site that must work reliably and be available in early
>         May, should one use dancer 1 or 2?
>         
>         Niels L
>         
>         http://genomics.dk
>